What Speaking at Cloud Native Rejekts Europe 2026 Taught Me

Speaking at Cloud Native Rejekts Europe 2026 in Amsterdam was not just another conference stop for me it was a very different kind of experience.

A True Community Event

One thing that makes Cloud Native Rejekts special and very different from many other conferences is that it is a pure community-driven event.

There are:

  • No big marketing machines
  • No overly polished vendor messaging
  • No pressure to “sell” anything

Instead, it’s built by and for:

  • Engineers
  • Practitioners
  • Builders

You can feel it everywhere:

  • In the openness of the discussions
  • In the willingness to challenge ideas
  • In the absence of ego

This creates a unique environment where people share:

  • What works
  • What doesn’t
  • What they are still struggling with

And for a speaker, that changes everything.

  • You’re not presenting to impress.
  • You’re contributing to a conversation.

Bringing an “Uncomfortable” Topic

My talk, Sherlock Pods: Investigating a Compromised Kubernetes Cluster, is not a comfortable topic. (Starting at 4:40)

Not because it’s complex but because it exposes a gap most teams don’t want to talk about:

We are not ready to investigate incidents in Kubernetes.

When I submitted the talk, I already knew:

  • This is not a “best practices” session
  • This is not a “how-to secure your cluster in 10 steps”
  • This is a “we have a problem” talk

And Cloud Native Rejekts turned out to be the perfect place for that.

Sharing What Actually Works (and What Doesn’t)

I made a deliberate choice in my talk:

No hype. No polished architecture. Only reality.

I shared:

  • My experiments with container checkpointing (CRIU)
  • The limitations across managed Kubernetes (AKS, EKS, GKE)
  • The friction of node-level access
  • The operational complexity nobody talks about

And interestingly, people didn’t push back.

They added to it.

That’s when you know you’re in the right room.

Where the Conversation Naturally Went: Automation & Agents

Another interesting pattern:

Almost every deep discussion ended up here: “How do we automate this?”

We talked about:

  • Capturing evidence automatically
  • Triggering actions from detection events
  • Building systems that preserve context before it disappears

And naturally, the conversation shifted toward:

  • AI
  • Agents
  • Autonomous response

This aligns perfectly with what I’ve been working on lately:

Moving from alerts to actionable, automated security workflows.

Final Thought

Cloud Native Rejekts reminded me why I enjoy speaking in the first place.

It’s not about the stage.

It’s about:

  • Testing ideas
  • Getting real feedback
  • Connecting with people facing the same challenges

And most importantly: Realizing that the problems you’re working on are not yours alone.

Maxime.

You may also like